0573-8596 3799


Zhejiang Macro-Solar Technology Co., Ltd.   Copyright(c)2018 All Rights Reserved


0573-8596 3799

National Unified Hotline

Wechat Official Account



Macro-Solar is focused on long-term development and is willing to create innovative,

win-win solutions with domestic and foreign partners.



What China's subsidy pull-back means for U.S. solar

What China's subsidy pull-back means for U.S. solar

Page view

Since the surprise announcement last week by the Chinese government that it would make multiple unfavorable changes for the compensation of solar projects, analysts have been scrambling to determine how this move by the world’s largest solar market will affect other markets around the globe.

The United States is no exception. , while there are still many unknowns, a few things are certain. The Chinese market will contract, leading to oversupply. In the highly liquid global solar panel market, prices will fall , while BNEF has put out a figure of 34% declines over the course of 2018, other some analysts are reticent to put numbers on this.

For the U.S. solar  market, which has been impacted by import duties under the Section 201 process, this is good news. For U.S. manufacturers – including those who are building or buying factories – it is not.

Downstream boost

“If there is downward pressure on module prices, it is just great if you are downstream,” Tony Clifford, the chief development officer at Stard Solar, told pv magazine. “The price drops will certainly be substantial, they could well be dramatic.”

Clifford says that the module price decreases that he is hearing could revive some projects that were sidelined due to the tariffs.

“There are markets where you just can’t make the deals pencil,” notes Clifford. “Areas where you don’t have the state or local incentives, but solar was getting cheap enough last year that you could build there with pre-tariff… those markets that we had written off, we are going to get back into more serious play. Which is exciting.”

MJ Shiao, GTM Research Head of Americas Research, has a similar perspective. He expects to see module prices falling to the high 30-cent per watt range, including the tariff cost. This is around the same as was seen in early 2017, a year before the tariffs took effect.

Neither Shiao nor Clifford thinks that the fall in prices will completely offset the effect of the Section 201 tariffs. “We are probably not back to a pre-201 situation,” Shiao told pv magazine. However, he notes that a global fall in module prices will “mute some of those effects.”

Both Shiao Clifford expect the biggest price fall to come towards the end of 2018. This is timely, given that GTM Research expected the most severe impacts from Section 201 to come in 2019. “It will take some of the teeth out of the dem that was reduced,” says Shiao.

As was the case with the Section 201 tariffs, the largest impacts will be on the utility-scale sector, where modules make up the highest portion of system costs.

Re-evaluating contracts

The shortness in module availability driven by the Section 201 process drove developers to attempt to lock in module supply, but now this dynamic may reverse. pv magazine has heard rumors of some very large module contracts being cancelled, but it is unclear if these are due to changing market conditions or other factors.

Shiao says that he expects some long-term contracts to be renegotiated. “Every developer has to play this game,” notes Shiao. “Definitely any time some announcement like this happens, folks on the dem side smell blood in the water, try to renegotiate as much as they can.”

He says the issue will be the degree to which developers can get away with this, to what degree suppliers will be willing to renegotiate.

Overall, the pending decline in China’s market may be bad news for global solar deployment, certainly is terrible for manufacturers. However, it may be very good news for U.S. developers.

In the second part of this article, we will examine the ramifications of these changing circumstances for the U.S. cell module manufacturing sector.